Skip to content

Decision area

RFP & Provider Selection

Choose a provider on evidence, not just a proposal. An RFP works only when the buyer knows what must be delivered, what comparisons are valid, and who decides. We help design that decision and, when appropriate, support the market event or train the team running it.

Decision basis

Make the decision testable.

Requirements, volumes, workflow, owner responsibilities, selection gates, and commercial assumptions determine what bidders need to demonstrate. Where a bid relies on AI or machine translation, that includes the proposed workflow, human-review thresholds, quality evidence, billing units, and how material model or workflow changes will be notified. A scorecard should record those choices before proposals arrive.

Requirements and baseline
Define what providers need to serve, using existing evidence or documented planned scope and demand.
Buyer and provider roles
State who owns workflow, review, reporting, decisions, and handoffs before proposals are evaluated.
Commercial comparison
Make volumes, pricing assumptions, and normalization rules comparable across bidders.
Evaluation and selection gates
Define evidence scenarios, scoring rules, reviewers, and decision authority before bids arrive.

Evidence limits

A winning score is not an operating model.

A bid can look strong while the buyer's own requirements, baseline, or responsibilities remain undefined. Missing information becomes an explicit evidence limit rather than an invented comparative score.

Possible outcomes

An RFP is not always the next step.

The right answer may be to define the operating model first, renegotiate an incumbent arrangement, or stay with a provider under stronger governance. A competitive event is one possible outcome, not a default.

Relevant engagements

Set the sourcing criteria before evaluating providers.

Three engagements distinguish preparing the selection, managing the event, and equipping the buyer to run it.

Engagement

Localization RFP Design

When the buyer needs a defensible RFP and comparison method, but will manage the market event itself.

Starting scope

One selection, one award structure or service tower, one stakeholder group, and up to 15 program languages. Uses existing evidence or documented planned volumes, spend, systems, and requirements.

Included work

  • Define the selection decision and its scope.
  • Document the requirements against which providers will be evaluated.
  • Establish the operating assumptions for the selection.
  • Specify buyer and provider responsibilities.
  • Structure the commercial comparison.
  • Define evidence scenarios for provider responses.
  • Build the evaluation method.
  • Document the selection process rules.

Expected outputs

Formats confirmed at scoping.

  • Issue-ready RFP.
  • Pricing workbook.
  • Evidence templates.
  • Evaluation scorecard.
  • Evaluator guide.
  • Launch package.

Operating boundary

Provider outreach, live Q&A, proposal scoring, reference checks, negotiation, award support, and transition execution are outside this engagement.

Engagement

Managed Localization RFP

When the buyer needs support managing the selection event, moderating evidence, and presenting a defensible recommendation.

Starting scope

One selection, one award structure, up to four invited providers, an evaluator group of up to six, one Q&A round, two finalist sessions, and one clarification round.

Included work

  • Build on RFP Design and launch the selection event.
  • Manage bidder communications.
  • Coordinate bidder questions and answers.
  • Review submission completeness and selection gates.
  • Normalize provider pricing for comparison.
  • Coordinate evaluator scoring.
  • Moderate the evaluation discussion.
  • Support finalist evaluation sessions.
  • Coordinate reference checks.
  • Prepare a recommendation for the buyer.
  • Prepare the award decision package.

Expected outputs

Formats confirmed at scoping.

  • All Design outputs.
  • Event record.
  • Normalized commercial comparison.
  • Moderated score record.
  • Recommendation.
  • Award transition package.

Operating boundary

Legal advice, contract drafting, unlimited negotiation, procurement-platform administration, provider migration, and post-award governance are outside scope.

Engagement

Localization RFP Training

When the buyer team plans to run its own RFP but needs a practical method for evaluation and decision records.

Starting scope

One preparation call, one three-hour workshop, up to eight participants, one applied exercise, and one follow-up session.

Included work

The workshop covers how to:

  • define requirements.
  • structure selection assumptions.
  • identify the evidence needed.
  • normalize pricing.
  • set selection gates.
  • weight criteria.
  • apply rating anchors consistently.
  • moderate evaluator discussion.
  • keep defensible decision records.

Expected outputs

Formats confirmed at scoping.

  • Workshop.
  • JPK workbook and templates.
  • Applied exercise.
  • Follow-up action summary.

Operating boundary

Building a live RFP, proposal evaluation, event management, extensive customization, and procurement-policy training are outside scope.

Custom work

LSP-to-LSP Migration

Migration is custom work, not one of the three standard RFP engagements. The decision must account for continuity, ownership, transition constraints, and the handoff after selection. Scope is agreed separately.

Independence in provider selection

The decision belongs to the buyer.

JPK does not receive provider commissions, referral fees or compensation tied to a selection outcome, and does not resell provider services or software. The recommendation is made for the buyer. See how independence works for the operating boundary.

Related paths

Fit call

What evidence would make the provider choice defensible?

Show us how the providers would be compared and what remains undecided. We can identify gaps in criteria, evidence, or ownership before an RFP begins.